Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can see Mehrdad's point; we don't know how they will perform. I as well know the Canon's are miserable, but my point is that , for my humble intents and purposes, I like to get in close with a wide,; photograph the action there. With a Rangefinder wide at these speeds (and I use a 'old' Noct and like it) you'll need the external viewfinder, and to monitor your focus, the photographer will constantly be shifting from external finder to rangefinder. Even with an 'add on eyepiece', the DOF will be nil, and focus best be right on the money, and this may prove troublesome. They are large pieces of glass as well. My point essentially is that I am both an M and R user - and using the M with a 21, 24 or 28 I like to get the grab shot right in the center of the action. With the current 2.8 and 2.0 objectives, I can pre-focus, use f/8.0 or f/5.6, even f/4.0, get right in there and shoot away. I can do that also with the new glass; but then I am paying for light I am not using. Hence the thought that I'd rather have them in an R version on my DMR (or better R10) than on my M8/8.2. Wide open at f/1.4, shooting within a group of moving people, I'm constantly framing and focusing with different finders. See my point? Then there are the 'corner cyan blues' to contend with - maybe. Edward -- Edward J. Caliguri ejcaliguri@comcast.net