Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] WSJ Leica Article
From: r.s.taylor_post at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Tue Sep 16 17:59:49 2008
References: <738432.97708.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <DAAA24BC6D864F9C82ECBCB4D00A14C4@dadquad>
 
Make that six.


Regards,

Dick
off-list comments to r.s.taylor at comcast dot net please.





On Sep 16, 2008, at 8:25 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> The LUG is the only photo group I know where at least five people  
> actually
> read the Wall Street Journal and post about it ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [Leica] WSJ Leica Article
>
> May be old news, but was new to me:
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122152103387739231.html
> Bob
>  Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> rgacpa@yahoo.com
> http://www.raflexions.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] WSJ Leica Article)
 In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] WSJ Leica Article)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] WSJ Leica Article)