Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Sep 14 11:43:13 2008
References: <BC51B85B-B2BD-4ED7-9775-74C20ADE9B61@frozenlight.eu> <48CD5ACE.9010207@san.rr.com>

On Sep 14, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:

> Nathan
>
> If you are only looking, it doesn't matter ;-)


now there is a man of some wisdom and experience...


Steve


>
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> We paid the last visit of the season to our beach bar yesterday-- 
>> they close down for the autumn today. Not that it was particularly  
>> autumnal yet:
>>
>> http://www.greatpix.eu/gallery/4253606_netUM#372048818_2fQq4-O-LB
>>
>> My 19-year old son and his visiting friend from England enjoyed  
>> playing with my E3, the 50-200mm zoom and the 1.4 extender. For  
>> some reason, it was mainly the long end that interested them ;-)
>>
>> After looking at this picture, we debated the key question about  
>> whether these boobs were surgically enhanced or not, without  
>> reaching a clear conclusion. I think they are fake.
>>
>> Nathan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)