Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A 24 is not ultra wide. A 24 is not a 21. Different ballgame. A 21 is ultrawide. A 24 is "a little on the wide side of wide". F2 is a different ballgame than f1.4 Some kid is having fun with Photoshop coming up with wild ideas and here we all are suckers talking to death about it. We need to be smarter than that! We need some real proof something exists first and that it makes some sense before we go waxing lyrical about it on the lug. mark@rabinergroup.com Mark William Rabiner > From: EPL <manolito@videotron.ca> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:01:41 -0400 > To: <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Re: 21/1.4?? > > Leica would not be the first with super-fast wides. > > Canon makes a 24/1.4, Nikon a 28/1.4. Olympus had a 21/2. > > Who here has used any of these and will report to us about their quality > and > utility? > > Emanuel > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information