Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Len, I looked for developer options, too, because of the cost of ATP DC Spur. When I did some research on the APUG several months ago there were positive references to a good alternative developer. I don't recall who made it. Moersch perhaps. I got the impression it was only available in Europe and not in the USA. Results from ATP will likely be very developer dependent. The comments I read regarding Rodinal and ATP was that it worked. Some liked it. Some didn't. Nothing I read gave me the impression that ATP 1.1 in Rodinal was equivalent to Tech Pan in Technodol, which is what I'm after. (Anything less and there are plenty of other options). When I have some time I'm going to do some testing. OTOH testing can end up costing more than going with the recommended solution. I'll probably buy the expensive stuff, but use it judiciously. DaveR -----Original Message----- From: Leonard Taupier [mailto:len-001@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:06 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon Scanner Problem Bob, Because of your post I wanted to try the Rollei ATP 1.1 in my Nikon scanners (CS9000 and CS V). I assume this is a very high contrast, high sharpness no grain film. The film price is OK but the developer is very expensive. I see in the Massive Developer Chart that Rodinal can be used at a 1+300 dilution. Do you have any idea how this would work out. I'm willing to experiment with anything. As to your problem I would have no idea why it won't scan. Are the negatives real thin (density)? Len