Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not cheap, but very effective - its a part of Nikon Capture NX: http://www.niksoftware.com/viveza/en/entry.php?view=intro/viveza_announcement.shtml Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > I can see your point, though the jpgs I looked at on the site you > mentioned (I could only look at the embedded jpgs) would have passed > my criteria (but I don't take much color, so I'm just a hack). > > Your best bet sounds like it would be to take a digital card into a > shop that has an M8 and ask them to let you do some test shots. I > suspect that only you can judge the results. > > If I remember correctly Lightroom or at least Photoshop has some tools > to help you pull some details out of the extreme highlights. But in > general, I'd compare digital capture to color transparencies, not to > color negative films. > > There are so many benefits of digital over color negative films that > even if I'd have to sacrifice one thing on my wish-list, there are so > many others that are so much easier to deal with than they are in film > (color temperature ... consistency across a whole shoot in a social > situation, for example) that I'd still opt for digital when it comes > to color. > > This from a die-hard film addict. > > Daniel > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Wyndham Pulman-Jones <simonpj@mac.com> > wrote: > > The one thing that has held me back from buying an M8 is my dislike of > the look of blown highlights in digital photos. Almost all of my shooting > is > of people interacting in social and working situations - and I always > expose > by taking incident readings for people's faces and letting everything else > fall where it may. This frequently means that lighter exteriors visible > through windows or doors are overexposed - but when using fast colour > negative film there is almost always some tone and character to the > overexposed area. The same also applies to highlights on people's hair when > strongly backlit. > > > > When I have used digital (Epson RD-1, Canon 1Ds) I have not liked the > totally white blown out highlights, fringed with un-natural looking > chromatic aberation, that often result from shooting in this way (when you > are not able to worry about exposinig for areas of the photo not carrying > the narrative interest, which might end up significantly overexposed.) > > > > Does the M8 suffer from this just as much as any other digital camera? If > so, what's the best technique for stopping those 'outside the scene' > highlights from blowing out? Or is it just not possible with the M8 to 'set > and forget' exposure in the way that you can with incident metering for the > latitude of negative film? > > > > (I found some M8 DNG samples which show totally blown out 'through the > window' highlights which have the digital look that just doesn't look right > to me: http://rpo.eranet.tv/) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Simon. > > Cambridge, UK. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >