Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun Aug 17 09:32:38 2008
References: <367890.83837.qm@web27303.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <6174BA98-254A-4E96-9C84-455A2A5AE120@frozenlight.eu> <200808171247.AUU55474@rg4.comporium.net> <029e01c90078$de5ea570$9b1bf050$@net> <38D2A7A3-CEE1-4823-A04D-33F785CD8636@cox.net> <02a401c9007c$88874180$9995c480$@net> <5B12A8B2-ED5C-408B-9B06-59892BB02C2E@cox.net>
At 12:24 PM 8/17/2008, you wrote:
>On Aug 17, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:
>
>>Steve: I have already been denigrated/chastised for that one.....
>>You gotta come up with new material......
RAW files are your negatives. Without RAW you are working from a
3x5, already developed, drugstore print. If that's all you need,
that's fine. If you ever want to do your own developing or make
bigger prints, you'd better have a RAW file.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
In reply to:
Message from daniel.ridings at yahoo.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)