Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If some of the modern designs now of pocket point and shoots using CCD's the sized of super 8 film came out with one in a 4/3's I'd be interested in one. For going places when I'm not so able to carry a side bag. There's one out now already the sigma I think. Despite a bunch of misleading marketing making you think it's a 1.5 crop. If I'm able to carry side bag I'd have a D40x with a 45mm pancake in it at least. But I'm not going to shoot a super 8 sized sensor. I would shoot a 4/3's though. In a pinch. A tight pinch. Like in my jacket pocket. I'm just not going tot think its a "replacement" for a 1.5 crop circle system. The bodies are all still way too big. And the lenes also are. With a format half the size. A big system with a small format. Not for me. Some day they'll get around to making more money by downsizing the designs. By then I'll be shooting a down sized 36x24mm CCD system. mark@rabinergroup.com Mark William Rabiner > From: Geoff Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:16:20 +1000 > To: 'Leica Users Group' <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: RE: [Leica] A mini-digital M (!)? > > That is a fascinating development, Richard. It raises a LOT of questions in > my mind. > Will Mark Rabiner want to buy one ;-) > When will practical cameras and a range of lenses actually appear? > How will it affect the existing four thirds sales? > How will the adaptor work with existing lenses? Theoretically if should be > negative 20mm thick!! ;-) > How do they deal with the change in angles with the shorter flange to > sensor > distance? > After all, the lesser angle is toted as a virtue in the current cameras. > The shorter distance was already seen to be difficult to overcome for > sensor > design for the M8. > Another reason while Photokina should be really, really interesting this > year. I wish I could go. > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: [Leica] A mini-digital M (!)? > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080501microfourthirds.asp > > A micro 4/3rd with half of the flange to film distance, meaning no > space for a mirror box. DPreview think this necessitates an EVF or > LCD focusing, me think this could also mean RF focusing! > > The Olympus E420 is ridiculously small, now half the body depth, put > a Leica RF unit on top... Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... > > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, > please use richard at imagecraft.com) > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information