Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ireland photos & airport xrays
From: doug at ricecracker.net (doug@ricecracker.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 22:16:00 2008
References: <C4ADF928.FBF0%doug@ricecracker.net> <FC2A9116-B2BF-4B28-99F1-8B0D9144BC3D@frozenlight.eu>

hey nathan,

i like that a lot. an M6 in my hand makes me feel much more invisible then
my nikon gear.

doug

> Hi Doug,
>
> It may be Ted or it may someone else who said that it is not so much a
> matter of what camera you have but how you act that determines whether
> you can "get away" with it or not. I believe this to be true to a
> large extent.
>
> Whatever you camera, this is a lovely gallery!
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:17 PM, doug kim wrote:
>
>>
>> having a big nikon film body and a big 35-70mm (I only brought one
>> lens)
>> made me extremely conspicuous. when I took this shot:
>>
>> http://www.ricecracker.net/ireland.php?type=photo&section=ireland&page=2&pho
>> to=19
>>
>> I became the whole focus of that intersection. the crossing guard was
>> laughing, the kids stopped in the middle of the street and started
>> mugging
>> and people in the cars stopped at the light were asking me who I was
>> shooting for. even with tourist with their DSLRs, I stood out with
>> the F5. I
>> believe that with my M6, I could have been much more discreet and less
>> visible.
>>
>> that was the downside. the upside was a shot like this:
>>
>> http://www.ricecracker.net/ireland.php?type=photo&section=ireland&page=1&pho
>> to=24
>>
>> in just a few seconds, I was able to shoot six frames of this
>> gentlemen with
>> multiple focal lengths going wide and then tight, shallow and then
>> deep
>> depth of field.
>>
>> so maybe it was a trade off but the entire time I really really missed
>> having my M6 in my hand. it was a great test as I no longer have any
>> doubts
>> as to the value the M6 adds to my work.
>>
>> doug
>>
>> On 7/24/08 9:03 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Very nice shots....
>>>
>>> But back to YOUR question... How did it change the shots you took
>>> or the
>>> ones you prefer?
>>>
>>> What did you get that you would not have with the M?  Ditto the
>>> inverse?
>>>
>>> Frank Filippone
>>> red735i@earthlink.net
>>>
>>> did an interesting test for myself: I brought the nikon F5 instead
>>> of the M6
>>> because I wanted to see if the leica gear really changed the way I
>>> shot or
>>> if I was just gear fetishizing and obsessing over a brand name.
>>> mad
>>> the judgement: the F5 was so obnoxiously huge, it announced my
>>> presence
>>> wherever I was and it absolutely determined how and what I
>>> photographed. a
>>> good lesson learned.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> --
>> dougKIM photography
>> http://www.ricecracker.net
>> http://www.bornyogis.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from doug at ricecracker.net (doug kim) ([Leica] ireland photos & airport xrays)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] ireland photos & airport xrays)