Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks much, I don't keep up with all the changes so I will wait and see. Low light is a priority. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of slobodan dimitrov > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:39 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina > examples > > I would hold off getting another 40D, if you need low light > capabilities. > It seems that it is yet another all new ball game out there with the > coming Canon bodies. > I suspect that my 40D will be relegated to being my 10-17mm fisheye > platform after this September's offerings. > S.d. > > > On Jul 22, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Ken Carney wrote: > > > George, > > > > I also am a fan of the 10-22. In my bag (thanks be to Lugger Bob > > Baron for > > steering me to the right bag - I am bag challenged) I keep a 40D > > with the > > 24-70L attached, and a 20D with the 10-22 attached. Then there are > > some > > other Canon primes for really low light. The Leica lenses are > > probably > > better, but I just want to get the image quickly without a lot of > > fuss. I > > will probably get another 40D body - it is marginally better than > > the 20D > > IMHO. Fortunately, I don't print large, 10x15 on 13x19 paper, so > > the 40D is > > fine for that. > > > > Ken > >