Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina examples
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Tue Jul 22 19:00:50 2008

Thanks much, I don't keep up with all the changes so I will wait and see.
Low light is a priority.

Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of slobodan dimitrov
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:39 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina
> examples
> 
> I would hold off getting another 40D, if you need low light
> capabilities.
> It seems that it is yet another all new ball game out there with the
> coming Canon bodies.
> I suspect that my 40D will be relegated to being my 10-17mm fisheye
> platform after this September's offerings.
> S.d.
> 
> 
> On Jul 22, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Ken Carney wrote:
> 
> > George,
> >
> > I also am a fan of the 10-22.  In my bag (thanks be to Lugger Bob
> > Baron for
> > steering me to the right bag - I am bag challenged) I keep a 40D
> > with the
> > 24-70L attached, and a 20D with the 10-22 attached.  Then there are
> > some
> > other Canon primes for really low light.  The Leica lenses are
> > probably
> > better, but I just want to get the image quickly without a lot of
> > fuss.  I
> > will probably get another 40D body - it is marginally better than
> > the 20D
> > IMHO.  Fortunately, I don't print large, 10x15 on 13x19 paper, so
> > the 40D is
> > fine for that.
> >
> > Ken
> >


Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina examples)
In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina examples)