Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, I also am a fan of the 10-22. In my bag (thanks be to Lugger Bob Baron for steering me to the right bag - I am bag challenged) I keep a 40D with the 24-70L attached, and a 20D with the 10-22 attached. Then there are some other Canon primes for really low light. The Leica lenses are probably better, but I just want to get the image quickly without a lot of fuss. I will probably get another 40D body - it is marginally better than the 20D IMHO. Fortunately, I don't print large, 10x15 on 13x19 paper, so the 40D is fine for that. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Lottermoser George > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:27 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] About Easing into LeiCanon Photography / Tokina > examples > > hi Douglas, > > Both beautiful wide images. > I had no doubt that the Tokina performs well; and didn't intend to > suggest anything by my post. > You simply reminded me that I settled on keeping the 20D "because" of > the 10 -22. > In fact at some point I may actually upgrade to a used 30D or 40D > just for that lens. > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > >