Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another 28 CV
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov)
Date: Fri Jul 18 17:24:16 2008
References: <20080719000642.63F2BDFC1CB@smtp1.nine.ch> <005701c8e934$155da910$4018fb30$@net>
 
At $700 list price, I don't think so!
s.d.

On Jul 18, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Jim Shulman wrote:

> Wonder why they changed the 28, then--the old 1.9 was a super lens.
>
> Jim Shulman
> Bryn Mawr, PA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of  
> Didier
> Ludwig
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:07 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: [Leica] Another 28 CV
>
> http://tinyurl.com/66gc82
> M-mount, a bit smaller than the 28/1.9. The fact it's not asph  
> might mean a
> nicer bokeh.
> 75'000 Yen which could end in a street price of $600 approx (my  
> guess).
> Didier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Another 28 CV)
 In reply to: Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Another 28 CV)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Another 28 CV)