Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some Elmars
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun Jul 6 14:49:51 2008
References: <a2f8f4470807020541t8221767s6f1b448177d0c173@mail.gmail.com><C496AB66.1686B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <a2f8f4470807061427q5f182927u96d60cf0c246e96f@mail.gmail.com>

Daniel,

I've always heard that there are no good 35/3.5 Elmars.  By now, all are 
hopelessly hazy. Now, 35/2.8 Summicrons, that's entirely different and much 
more expensive. Those are the reasons, for now, that I have a great Jupiter 
12.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Some Elmars


> Mark and Luis, thanks.
>
> I have to admit, that I enjoy my little kit. It is also nice to hear
> your kind comments, both of you.
>
> Now ... if I could just run across a good 35/3.5 Elmar (I only have a
> modern Cosina 35 for the IIIf), then I could fit a whole kit in my
> coat pocket :-)
>
> Thanks again. Things have been a little rough going and it feels nice.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
>> Great shots Daniel!
>> you see more than I!
>>
>> I picked up a 90 f4 my last day in Rochester on that LHSA thing
>> Sunday 0ct 14, 2007; got it from Jimmy Koh a great deal.
>> Got some nice shots with it I thought.
>> Its nice to have a full system when you have a camera;
>> A wide, normal and tele. that's my definition of a "full" system.
>> I've also learned to appreatate my other Elmar, the 50 3.5.
>> Also part of my IIIF system. Harder to use than my 35mm Summaron;
>> But such a distinct signature or finger print;
>> That is well worth it. Some mini reach....
>>
>> I think of as My IIIF as my Leica Leica.
>>
>>
>>
>> mark@rabinergroup.com
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 14:41:57 +0200
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] Some Elmars
>>>
>>> 90/4 Elmar
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2008-06/08v26-0015.jpg.html
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2008-06/08v26-0014.jpg.html
>>>
>>> My mood:
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2008-06/08v26-0002.jpg.html
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2008-06/08v26-0003.jpg.html
>>>
>>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2008-06/08v26-0001.jpg.html
>>>
>>> Been doing a lot of digital the last couple of months, but it is not
>>> interesting.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Some Elmars)
Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Some Elmars)
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Some Elmars)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Some Elmars)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Some Elmars)