Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon Jun 23 16:22:00 2008
References: <f2f825f20806230930g46c6412fsb4ef3d76941d20cd@mail.gmail.com> <0K2X002H2L8VHB50@l-daemon> <200806232310.m5NNAgfd049476@mail.imagecraft.com> <20080623182722.4ea4cb08@desktop-philfo.here> <000f01c8d582$993ce9f0$6b01a8c0@dadquad> <20080623184908.5ec08d94@desktop-philfo.here>
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
> I am such a schmuck. I completely neglected to say that it is a
> beautiful portrait, instead getting hung up on the equipment used.
> Something I do far too often.
> PhilFo
it is truly beautiful, has a wonderful feeling...I'm sure the subject
loves it...
but your equipment points Phil were so cogent,
so well argued...
let's see... 1) the Noctilux is too good a lens, so you get more glow
with the Canon, and 2) cheaper is better...
how can one argue with that logic?
you are going to destroy all that the LUG stands for...
Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)