Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Geoff, Also guess which is the better value now - the F3 is built like a rock, and is a very flexible system, thanks to various accessories that are available (viewfinders, focus screens,etc,etc)...some of those AIS lenses are no slouches either. Depends on whether you are a collector or user. Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > Chris, without in any way denigrating the experience and credentials of the > reviewer, the published information on the frame-lines is muddled and has > errors. On white balance, the current firmware does much better and of > course white balance considerations are not unique to the M8. > Regarding a 24x36 sensor, it remains very unlikely within the constraints > of > an M body. In practical terms you need just one more wide lens to > accommodate the 'crop factor'. It is different but very doable for an M > user > with a selection of great glass. Less of an issue than for any non-'full > frame' dSLR certainly (1.33 vs. 1.5, 1.6, 2x). > On mechanical solid film kit second hand prices, all six of my remaining > manual focus well built Nikon primes are currently for sale, for a total of > about one half to one third the value of a single modern used Leica M lens, > throw in two manual focus bodies (F3 and FE2) and we're maybe half to two > thirds of one lens. Guess which kit has better value retention ;-) > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman <lug-bounces%2Bhoppyman>=bigpond.net.au@ > leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Christopher Birchenhall > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2008 05:29 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 and the WAR > > Hi guys > > I must say I did find this report influential on my thinking. I > thought my grumblings on my faulty M7 was a reflection of my bad luck. > I have already suggested Leica's strength is in things mechanical - > let me add the obvious, namely optical. Yes the mechanical cameras > need TLC / C&A but there is currently a good deal of expertise in that > area. Anyway this report has tipped me over to thinking Leica as a > film system; as to digital I am now deeply committed to Nikon. (If > ever we have a mature FF Mx then maybe but my pending pension may not > fund it.) > > I still have the Leica bug, but for mechanical solid Germanic film kit > - especially at the current second hand prices. > > Chris B > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >