Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> wrote: > What do you all think about the old classical Summarit 50mm lens? > I can't seem to get the archives to work, so I'll ask for fresh opinions. > > ....Vick > Vick, The number one reason folks don't like their Summarit is that they have an example that has not been cleaned and/or has the front element abraded to flare heaven. The oils that Leica used to lubricate these lenses left an obnoxious film inside the lens that degraded the image a lot. I had mine cleaned and recoated about four years ago and like the lens very much. I would use it far more except that I now mostly use the Summilux ASPH for a walk around lens. But, the Summarit has a very unique look to it and even with a $200 overhaul you can get one for not much. Wide open it has a sharp/blur look that is similar to the Zeiss Softar's. Stopped down 2 stops you are good to go with some flare that can be used creatively. Other lenses in the 50mm segment that I would highly recommend would be a Zeiss Opton 1.5 Sonnar and a second generation Summiilux. Thanks for asking. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Don don.dory@gmail.com