Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris, My experience with legacy lenses shows that they are just fine. My Leica lenses work just fine if not better on my M8, and my R lenses when mounted on a 20D work also very well and are superior to the canon lenses I have tried. My Nikon 180/2.8 and 55 Micro3.5 lens works very well on my D200. Gene -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Christopher Birchenhall" <crbirchenhall@googlemail.com> > > LUGers > > Apologies if this has been well covered already but can I ask about > your experiences with legacy lenses on digital cameras. I ask because I > have been playing with a Nikon D300 and believe it performs best with > newer lenses designed for digital use; this experience is based on a new > Nikon Micro 60mm, a Zeiss 25mm ZF and a Tamron standard zoom. > In the Nikon communities there is a good deal of chatter about previously > highly regarded lenses not performing so well on the new cameras. My > reading is that the latest sensors require tighter lens designs. > > This may be more an issue for Nikon and less for Leica but I am concerned > that our hopes of using legacy lenses on a new Leica digital R may face > similar issues. > > I have to also note I have not made the move to the M8. My aim has been > to gather some new wider lenses in anticipation of the impact of the crop > factor. My impression is that M8 owners are happy enough but I have > heard about focusing issues with some lenses. Is there a noticeable > difference between lenses on the M8 e.g. do ASPH worker better? > > Thanks for your patience, Chris B > > P.S. The D300 is impressive and is making me look seriously at their D3. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information