Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think more worked over by baby teeth falling out, Gene! I doubt that Steve would have altered it?? But the shadows on her face seem to have a little more texture to them, maybe that makes the smoother skin look odd in comparison? In this one it would have been great to have sister number 2 at the back lean her face forward maybe. I mean due to the shallow DoF making her face softer. I'd commit my usual PS evil manipulation sin and remove the dangling coiled leads in this case too. Still, great great smiles and sweet kids. Likely more important than technical stuff. I can hear Steve's teeth grinding as he reads my comments ;-) Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [Leica] the two sisters... Steve, A nice photo, however the girl in the front looks weird. Her upper lip looks like it has been over/poorly worked over by photoshop. It looks false. The girl in the back looks just fine, as a comparison. Gene -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> > > http://www.solio.us/gallery/PAW/twokids > > > > say bye now... > > > thanks for looking, > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information