Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2008-05-08-13:48:57 Jim Nichols: > I agree with Gene. If a lens will cover 36mm in width, it will cover the > same dimension in height. Hence, it should cover at least 36x36mm. Er, what part of the Pythagorean theorem is confusing here? Don't just count on words which sound nice together; draw the two formats packed into circles, with the enclosing circles just kissing the corners of the enclosed rectangle (which might be a square). If an image circle is to be guaranteed to cover a rectangular format, the circle's diameter must be greater than or equal to the format's diagonal. The format's diagonal is the square root of the squares of the sides. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem For 24x36mm, that's 43.3mm (hence the Leica MTF graphs which go from zero to 21.6mm, half that -- the radius from center to edge of the image circle which covers 24x36). For 36x36mm that's 50.9mm. 50.9 is bigger than 43.3. Sure, some current R lenses (especially the longer ones) may have coverage to spare, but more coverage *would* be required. -Jeff