Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's - Steve
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Tue Apr 29 21:27:57 2008
References: <48177F7D.4010306@tele2.fr> <48179F2B.9010704@hemenway.com> <8E9791FA-7051-4ED6-9E6F-602617FDE9DC@cox.net>

Getting close Steve, but I still don't own, and might never do, the 
excellent lens you're refering to.
Focal length is about it, aperture is not, brand is so-so but funnily 
quite closer than you'd have expected :-D

Thanks for viewing and trying so hard.
Amiti?s
phx
.


Steve Barbour wrote:

> a Pan Leica 25mm 1.4   ?
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:
>
>> Phillipe:
>>
>> Wild guess!
>>
>> If you used a macro lens, and the camera is a 4-thirds then I'm  
>> guessing it's a 30mm to 50mm lens and that you photographed twice,  
>> or even three times the distance that is usual with a 35mm camera  
>> with a 50-55mm macro.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> Philippe AMARD wrote:
>>
>>> I have lost the count of weeks. But here's my submission for last  
>>> week's PAW.
>>> A test/contest/quiz:;
>>> Knowing that the camera was the L1 (cf. exif), what lens was used?
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3mgw52 <http://tinyurl.com/3mgw52>
>>> C&C mucho appreciated
>>> phx
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> best, Steve
>
>
> "I never wanted to be famous"
> http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/186890
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's)