Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Geoff, no fuzzillocking on that one , not back in the mood yet, but coming up soon :-D and the lens is within the range of the 2.8 Elmarit Zoom (exif would show data of lens if used). It shares more than range BTW. Thanks for viewing and sharing your thoughts Amiti?s Phx Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >Hi Philippe, I don't pretend to be able to identify the lens from that pic. >Since it is close up but with a four thirds focal length, I have no idea how >much DoF you would expect. Is this the standard 14-50 at 3.5? I note the >high shutter speed and the ISO. I don't think you needed the -1 exposure but >that is another discussion. The OOF areas are hard on my eyeballs as I wake >up here. Have you fuzzi-logiced this one a bit? > >Cheers >Geoff >http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ >-----Original Message----- >From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of >Philippe AMARD >Sent: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 06:05 >To: liste leica reflex; Leica Users Group >Subject: [Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's > >I have lost the count of weeks. But here's my submission for last week's >PAW. > >A test/contest/quiz:; > >Knowing that the camera was the L1 (cf. exif), what lens was used? > >http://tinyurl.com/3mgw52 > >C&C mucho appreciated >phx > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >