Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, the functions are the EXIF insertion, some flash zoom control and some vignette control, primarily significant with wides. This can be managed post as well, of course. However the integration of this in-camera processing with the UV/IR filter functions and the newest firmware does strengthen the case to have both coding and filters with wides. Not to say that it is essential but it has some benefit in some situations. In the full frame M9 the vignetting will be transparently neutralized, although Adobe will do it better in software. The lens coding will be entered by a simple menu option, making the coding redundant. The new f.95 Fuzzilogilux will have no aperture ring whatsoever although users may elect to purchase a phase shifting virtual aperture control which can also be set for any DoF or aperture combination you desire using quantam physics and a dilithium crystal power source to revisit the instant before the photo was taken. OK I made this last paragraph up ;-) Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 10:42 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal At 08:33 PM 4/23/2008, you wrote: >so the coding has nothing to do with outcome or photo quality, just >puts the lens into the exif...is that correct? > > >Steve I read somewhere - I can't find it now - that the coding would optimize the performance of the lens - addressing known vignetting and color balance issue, particularly with wide angle lenses. Tina _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information