Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] For Ted now ????
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed Apr 23 17:38:30 2008
References: <200804232102.m3NL2Fcn067400@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-W469A6BD1617FC1DDBFF424D4E20@phx.gbl>

On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:

>
> Well, I guess after teaching for 33 years I have a thick skin.  The  
> post was not intended as an insult or even kidding in any way, and I
> did not feel like I was wasting electrons, or film.  I just was  
> familiar with his comments about such photos and when I saw it
> I was reminded of him.  Ted has answered me on the Leica Reflex and  
> had kind words.  So, clueless but tough skinned.  I know that not  
> everybody appreciates all the photo styles that are reflected by LUG  
> members.  There are probably some that I downright dislike as well.
>
> Steve, perhaps this one is more to your liking?

clever Aram, painting is quite the opposite of peeling paint,


Steve


>  And I really truely just now noticed that there is also some  
> peeling paint or stucco in the background.  Sorry.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/misc/Mission+San+Juan+Capistrano-3975.jpg.html
>
>
> Aram
>
>
>> From: Harrison McClary <lists@mcclary.net>> Subject: Re: [Leica]  
>> For Ted> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>> Message-ID: 
>> <480F7EE9.3080106@mcclary.net 
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed> >  
>> Adam...count me in that clueless group as well....that shot up  
>> metal > could be just about any stop sign in rural Tennessee...LOL>  
>> > I'd like to think that all of us are thick skinned enough to take  
>> a > little good natured kidding, which is how I read Aram's post.>  
>> > > Adam Bridge wrote:> > I'm so utterly clueless that I don't  
>> understand your objection Steve.> > I read about kidding Ted who's  
>> not a fan of peeling paint and two> > rather interesting (to me)  
>> images.> >> > I found nothing objectionable in either, certainly  
>> NOT a waste of> > electrons which isn't something I'd like to see  
>> suggested to any image> > posted here in good faith.> >> > Adam> >>  
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net>  
>> wrote:> > > >> On Apr 22, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:>  
>> >>> >>> >> > >>> Hi Ted. Found this great peeling paint in Death  
>> Valley at Scotty's Castle> >>> > >> and thought of you, so I  
>> snapped it.> >> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/dv/Scottys+Castle-3564.jpg.html 
>>  While> >> this paint isn't exactly pealing, it is getting some  
>> help from a few> >> projectiles.> >> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/dv/Aguerberry+Camp-3383.jpg.html 
>>  Aram> >> > >> a waste of electrons Aram, and certainly not funny,  
>> nor in very good> >> taste,> >>> >>> >> why?> >>> >>> >>> >> Steve>  
>> > >
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

best, Steve


"I never wanted to be famous"
http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/186890


In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] For Ted now ????)