Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Wed Apr 23 08:17:01 2008
References: <000101c8a549$4c7ac8d0$6b01a8c0@dadquad>

I knew you would - rebel !
what's this address should I have the oranges sent to you?

Nice clouds by the way.
phx


Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

>Folks, some more pictures and a tale. While waiting to collect my child from
>school I walked along a footpath adjacent to a railway station photographing
>some clouds over the wire fence surrounding the property. I crossed through
>the station walkway (open to all), shot some more from the opposite footpath
>then walked back through the public access  to exit. I stopped and made a
>single photograph of the clouds since there were less poles in the way.
>Within 60 secs a rail employee moved quickly to me and told me that
>photography was forbidden. I was completely surprised by this patent
>foolishness. However, I explained that I was taking a picture of the
>beautiful clouds. To no avail! Sir, all photography is forbidden on our
>property. It is against the law!
>
>This is a public thoroughfare, a school on one side , shops the other and
>the actual station platforms below. I would say several thousand people per
>week use it. Heaven forbid that any of them might have evil camera-phones
>for clandestine pictures of the dirty tiles and rubbish bins or other
>national security assets sited there. Not seeking any confrontation I left
>this worthy and fearless guardian of freedom to his patrol and agreed to
>follow his ridiculous directive. Tonight I have actually located the
>department's policy explicitly permitting me to use my camera there as an
>amateur and within limits and naturally requiring that I follow sensible
>guidelines, not flashing the drivers etc. Yet it also tells me that I must
>obey every directive from their employees or they may detain me for arrest
>by a policeman. Even worse, should you have permission under their own
>policy to take photos within their property, it is VERBOTEN to post any
>pictures on the internet in case terrorists look at them. I'm not making
>this up. What unbelievable nonsense. So there it is. This foolishness so
>incensed me that I fell compelled to share the product of my blatant and
>appalling offence with you here. I shall burn in hell, then for these links.
>To compound my offence, these were taken with a fast fifty AT f 5.6!!
>
> 
>
><http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/96037500>
>
><http://tinyurl.com/6fhkou>
>
> 
>
>Oh and thank heavens this defender of national security did not detect the
>photo of the scene of the crime, else I might still be handcuffed or left
>beaten next to their Coke machine. Sssh, there's  a Senorita! But you can
>clearly see the location of their coke machine which every extremist maniac
>will be sure to pinpoint for a suicide bombing.
>
><http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/96037503>
>
>http://tinyurl.com/6r2pc8
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Cheers
>
>Geoff
>
> <http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>
> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal)