Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They are all dogs. If you really, really need that half stop more than the f/3.4 Telyt, go for the third version. In any case, good luck with framing and focus and shoot with as contrasty a medium as is available because the 135 f/2.8s were about as dull a lens as Leica ever made. Trust me. Bow wow. Buzz On 1/3/08 5:43 PM, "Michiel Fokkema" <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > I need the fastest 135 I can get for my M. It's clear that that is the > 135/2.8. > But there are three versions. First and second seem to be very close and > they can't be distinguished without taking it apart. The third is > supposed to be better. But how much better? Can the difference be seen > in daily use when using slow speeds and fast film? wide open off course. > > Best regards, > > Michiel Fokkema > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information