Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work)
From: phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard)
Date: Mon Oct 1 10:38:10 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC803083944EF@exchange8.asc.local> <46FF6D91.1040007@hemenway.com> <000601c80351$4be56be0$6401a8c0@asus930> <471B7676-3F5A-4F05-914F-C9C6A3A88E70@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20070930132131.0249d030@comporium.net> <D04F9AF2-C40C-46E9-8038-F2F75E62EABE@cox.net> <C193A720-D8A8-44E6-A43F-7073F249E961@mac.com> <4701223B.8000505@waltjohnson.com>

Then the faking would be real ...
to be continued.
Winking Phil...x


Walt Johnson wrote:

> I'm still trying to discover what real is. Have more than a passing 
> acquaintance with fake, but not real. Hell, everything could be fake. 
> What if there isn't really any real?
>
> Walt
>
>
> Lottermoser George wrote:
>
>> My immediate reaction to seeing the photo: "No relationship to 
>> reality (as I experience it)."
>> Then: "illustrative. Of what? What does this intend to illustrate? I 
>> don't understand its message."
>>
>> The lighting (the reason Kyle pointed us to it) does have some appeal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george@imagist.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>>> But not to me ;-)  It made me gag to look at it.  The skirt is too 
>>>> far in her mouth to be sexy - more like a gag.  That's just a 
>>>> female's perspective, though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> well it made me gag too..
>>>
>>> and a little sad too...
>>>
>>> (because of the very young girl, who looks even younger)
>>>
>>> maybe because of the proximity of the image to soft porn, the age of 
>>> the girl, mixed with the obvious manipulation and opportunism...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))