Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ahem...yeah. Okay, I bought a Summaron f2.8 from a fellow Canadian. And I bought a "M2 in a baggie", that I reassembled myself (with some parts and advice from DAG and Youxin Ye). And I have an M5 with a hole in the shutter coming to me. Okay, I fell off the wagon. And the Tri-Elmar feeling is passing. Thank God. ...Vick -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Williams Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:47 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Oh god,I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me I'm insane. Hey Vick, Did you not claim awhile back to STOP buying? But for rehab quitters, the Tri-Elmar is a very nice lens. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 6:23 AM Subject: [Leica] Oh god,I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. Tell me I'm insane. > Oh god, I'm thinking of trying a Tri-Elmar 28/35/50. > > Tell me I'm insane. > > Or tell me that it is the best thing that I could be doing, and why I > haven't done it yet. > > I'm thinking only of the 2nd version, with DOF scale and 46mm filter. Is > that the sensible one to get? > > Vick > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information