Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jack, Part of the reason for the lower prices of R lenses, is that over the years, the R line has been somewhat of the Black Sheep or Unwanted Cousin to the M line. Unfortunate for the popularity of the R system, but great for those of us who use it when it comes to used lens prices. Gene -------------- Original message from Jack Maddox <jmaddox01@suddenlink.net>: -------------- > Thanks to all (Mark, Hoppy, Chris,Gene } for your responses to the R > lens question. I am an avid eBay watcher. It seems to me that R lenses > lag behind rangefinder lenses in price. I was trying to ascertain if > this was because of image quality or just plain supply and demand > issues.I have delayed purchasing Erwins compendium long enough. I intend > to obtain and read it.Thanks for bringing it to my attention again. > > Jack > > Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> Jack, I recommend two books for you. > >> Erwin Puts Leica Lens Compendium is an excellent source of information. > >> For > >> Leica fans, I think definitely worth owning the hard > >> copy. Erwin's site reports that there may be a new book in the future. > >> The > >> current one was published by Hove, no longer in business, > >> but I think the book is still commonly available. You can download the > >> most > >> current version of the book (sans pictures) from Erwin's > >> site with a donation requested. http://www.imx.nl/photo/site_map.html > >> The smaller "Leica Pocket Book" also from Hove has good information > >> too, > >> including the MTF diagrams. I think that the 7th edition > >> from 2004 is the latest. One point that Erwin makes is that a number of > >> more > >> modern M lenses share common design and performance > >> attributes with their R cousins. Amongst the macros and telephotos for > >> the R, > >> some designs are apparently unsurpassed by any other > >> optics. People like Doug Herr and other owners and users of these here > >> on > this > >> list will be able to attest to that, I think. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Hoppy > >> > >> > > > > > > Ewins book reads better than a 25 cent paperback thriller. You cant put > > it > > down. > > Shame he doesn't make any money on it I don't think when you buy one. > > The publishing company went under and its a mess so I read. > > > > Hope it gets picked up again and updated. > > So the very latest stuff is in there. Like the new tri Elmar. > > Love to hear about what he'd say about that. > > > > He raves about the old tri Elmar to an extent which is one of the few > > things > > I don't see eye to eye with in the book. Though I've never used one. It > > kind > > of leaves me cold. A huge f4 trying to be three lenses. > > I think of it as a "try Elmar". > > > > But a > > 16 > > 18 & > > 21! > > > > That's two focal lengths Leica had not made yet. > > And an ultra wide not quite zoom but varifocal lens might be not such an > > incorrect term. > > > > Or 21-24-28 > > > > Mark William Rabiner > > rabinergroup.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information