Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Yorker Leica Article
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Wed Sep 19 04:41:53 2007
References: <200709180113.l8I1Cghg055785@server1.waverley.reid.org> <443D7F33-56EC-4960-94B4-58206B8FA533@netvigator.com> <d0b7801721739.46f0125d@shaw.ca><00a201c7fa54$2bc276b0$1501a8c0@opportunity> <46F106EC.3030401@summaventures.com>

Oh nice, Peter. You did really well up until the point where you dissed the 
M ;-)
Or may we say that it was a particular M?  A number larger than 7? In that 
case your purist artiste cred may be resurrected,

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Leica] New Yorker Leica Article

Thanks for posting Lew, I just read through all seven pages; they are eally
well-written. It's great to hear someone outside the community extolling the
virtues of Leica, even if he was using an M* ;-)

Peter Dzwig

Lew wrote:
> Posted by Clark Macomber on the CVUG list
>  http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/09/24/070924fa_fact_lane
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] New Yorker Leica Article)
In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (Howard Cummer) ([Leica] M8 Kaput - another update)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] M8 Kaput - another update)
Message from lew1716 at optonline.net (Lew) ([Leica] New Yorker Leica Article)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] New Yorker Leica Article)