Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] philosophy of street photography
From: johnbeeching at gmail.com (John Beeching)
Date: Mon Aug 20 04:51:42 2007
References: <43943D65632C7E89F0EB85FE@hindolveston.reid.org>

Dear Brian,

Street photography ranges from the concealed to the staged via the
discrete.  There is generally a desire to remain uninvoved and to capture
what is happening "out there" uninfluenced by the observer; certainly, that
is where I woudl put myself: http://johnbeeching.com/. However, you can't
always avoid being observed/detected even if only in an undefinably
psychological sense, and occasionally that interaction can make the picture:
http://johnbeeching.com/selection/album/slides/05-18-15-L1-F1.html
But more often than not it can spoil it.

John


On 19/08/07, Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> wrote:
>
> I've been curious for years why it is that the norm in street photography
> is
> not to interact with the subjects. I am primarily a portrait person, and
> everything about portraiture involves interacting with the subject. The
> street photographs that get the most accolades seem to be those in which
> the
> photographed subjects do not show awareness of the photographer. I always
> find that unsettling.
>
> Why is this? Is there some philosophical basis, or is it just habit?
>
> Brian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
John Beeching
http://johnbeeching.com/

In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] philosophy of street photography)