Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Viso III, Black 65 image examples
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Fri Aug 17 13:43:20 2007
References: <BAY108-DAV751BE7CE3AB4A0CB185F2C8DF0@phx.gbl> <6.2.1.2.2.20070817120229.0158d1d0@pop.med.cornell.edu>

plant veins and back standing 1

i don't know why;^)

ric


On Aug 17, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Chris Saganich wrote:

>
> I'm one of those folks who like the viso and take it out with me  
> when I think I'll be in some good macro situations.  Here are some  
> examples of the Black 65 on a viso II (which is my perference) on  
> my MP hand held in available light from infinity to as close as it  
> will go without additional extension.  One handy feature of the  
> black version is you can open the aperture all the way to focus and  
> then close it down to whatever stop you were using without taking  
> your face from the finder.  The lens has above average contrast  
> which is a bitch for some B&W but once you get the hang of exposure  
> and development the added resolution is a great asset.  The images  
> below are triX processed in straight D23 which by definition is low  
> actuance.  Having enlarged at least one of these images (the giant  
> leaf) to 16x20 I was impressed by the definition which remained  
> despite being hand held in low light at full magnification.
>
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs045.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs046.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs047.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs048.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs049.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs050.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs051.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs052.htm
> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/street_pages_2007/bs056.htm
>
>
> Chris S
>
> At 04:59 PM 8/16/2007, you wrote:
>> There is a big difference in the performance of the chrome and  
>> later black 65mm Elmar lenses.  The chrome version is a low  
>> contrast lens that gives a pastel like performance that is  
>> charming in a way.  The black Elmar is a high contrast lens with  
>> much improved resolution.  It is one of my favorite lenses, and is  
>> great on the viso or R bellows.  The performance on the edges is  
>> not the best at infinity, but the lens is designed for close-up  
>> work, and is a delight in this range.  Erwin Putz does not  
>> consider either of these lenses as being exceptional performers,  
>> and makes a comment that the Elmar design is not optimum for macro  
>> work.  I don't agree with him on this in regard to the performance  
>> of the black version.  I might also add that the 100mm f4 macro  
>> Elmer for the Leica R series cameras is also a classical Elmar  
>> design, and it performs quite well both in near and far distances.
>>
>> Ferrel Anderson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from andersonfe at msn.com (ferrel anderson) ([Leica] Viso III)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Viso III, Black 65 image examples)