Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lomo hype
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Thu Aug 9 12:13:41 2007
References: <1A5AAFC5-9417-4DDE-A5C0-510CC120BDEB@pandora.be> <004001c7dabe$4eadc180$0202a8c0@MacPhisto>

Exactly my point. Hyped. Thus overpriced way too high. Give that dude  
a good camera and his photos would really rock.
It's the color effects that interest me more. So I bought the  
cheepest pinhole camera possible.
Philippe

Op 9-aug-07, om 21:48 heeft Christopher Williams het volgende  
geschreven:

> Hold on, $95 for that camera then $125 for a Fed 5???
>
> I'd go for the fisheye instead.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Orlent"  
> <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
> To: "LUG Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 12:21 PM
> Subject: [Leica] Lomo hype
>
>
>> They do know how to hype a toy camera, but the guy that made the   
>> (technically shitty) photographs to prove the camera's funkyness  
>> sure  knows how to frame a shot, too:
>> http://shop.lomography.com/elikon/gallery/?page=4
>> Philippe
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Lomo hype)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Lomo hype)