[Leica] FS: Summicron 28

[grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)]

Hoppy,

Your'e gonna have to race me for that one.  ;-)  When at Cooter's Village 
Camera the other day, They had a new 24 that i wanted REALLY BAD, but I knew 
SWMBO would most likely break my other arm if I tried to buy it.  So I 
settled for the 28 Asph Elmarit at half the price.  ;-)

Gene

-------------- Original message from "G Hopkinson" 
<hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>: -------------- 


> Maybe we can organise a LUG meeting where everyone puts one Leica lens on 
> the 
> table and we all choose one from the pile. I want to 
> stand really, really close to someone with a 24! 
> 
> Cheers 
> Hoppy 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Slobodan Dimitrov 
> Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 13:16 
> To: Leica Users Group 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28 
> 
> I've got a Noctilux floating out there some place also. It use to be 
> Ernie's once. 
> 
> Slobodan Dimitrov 
> Labor Images 
> http://www.sdimitrovphoto.com/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:59 PM, G Hopkinson wrote: 
> 
> > Quite a LUG family connection on some of these lenses. I recently 
> > "met" someone else's Nocti, many miles from home! 
> > 
> > Cheers 
> > Hoppy 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
> > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On 
> > Behalf Of 
> > Slobodan Dimitrov 
> > Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:50 
> > To: Leica Users Group 
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28 
> > 
> > Didn't I sell you that lens? 
> > 
> > s.d. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Jim Shulman wrote: 
> > 
> >> A few years ago the Viewfinder magazine ran a comparison of the 
> >> Summicron 28 
> >> and the CV 28/1.9. They found (in conventional large prints) that 
> >> there was 
> >> no discernable difference from f 2.8 and smaller; at maximum 
> >> aperture the 
> >> Summicron was marginally (though this was disputed) sharper at the 
> >> edges. 
> >> 
> >> So, for Arche's purposes, the CV is probably just dandy. Mine was a 
> >> terrific lens; I only sold it because I rarely used that focal 
> >> length. 
> >> 
> >> Jim Shulman 
> >> Bryn Mawr, PA 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message----- 
> >> From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org 
> >> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> >> slobodan 
> >> dimitrov 
> >> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:54 PM 
> >> To: Leica Users Group 
> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28 
> >> 
> >> Oh! 
> >> I forgot that people did that nowadays. 
> >> I guess even a coke bottle can produce enough resolution for much of 
> >> the scanning done these days. 
> >> 
> >> s.d. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> Leica Users Group. 
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information