Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Didier wrote: >>Anyway, no camera, not even the high end Nikon DSLRs, can compete with the best Canon DSLR modes in terms of high ISO noise.<< I wonder how much of this is related to processing algorithms, and how much is inherent in the hardware. And if software/firmware related, are there tradeoffs? If so what are they? Noise was a big issue when I first started scanning. Over time I've learned to manage noise quite well by tweaking software -- Vuescan, MSU, Silverfast and Nikonscan. Some tradeoffs include loss of shadow detail, higher contrast and loss of highlight separation. And with color maybe some unwanted color shifts some of which are tough to fix in PS. With (scanning) software there's always a tradeoff, the degree of which depends. Every image is different. Sometimes noise isn't a bad thing. It's not like one solution is right for everything. If only I could limit my photography to one type of film in Sunny 16 conditions :-) I've always wondered how camera manufacturers determine what tradeoffs to accept, under what conditions. One camera can't do everything well. The Fuji F31fd I just bought is a pretty amazing low light P&S. But files are JPEG only. There's no raw option so post processing is limited. Thus images out of the camera had better be decent. In general they are for what the camera is -- a really good snapshot camera, or maybe a little beyond, that's inexpensive. But I'm still waiting for large camera image quality in a compact, just like we have with film. Cameras like the DP1 may be getting closer, but I'm guessing things will continue to improve. DaveR