Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don, I'm on DSL, so the image size does not bother my loading time. I have a habit of looking at Gallery images at the posted size, in your case approx 640x500, and then, if it is a good image, which yours is, I will click on the "view full size" icon at the top. In the case of this image, that shows approx 3200x2500, which led to my comment. As a general rule, I reduce the uploaded size to something like 800x625, so it doesn't spread off the screen. That's just my habit, and means nothing. It is still a great image. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 5:04 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG Don's PAW week 23 Selene, serene, and legs > Jim, > I'm a little confused. The posted image is approximately 640X500 which is > a > good size for the web. You should see enough detail without bogging down > your browser. Am I missing something? > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >