Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oh sorry. I mis-read. Hey I did say that I thought it was un-dated! So still a nice 30 second portrait and a frozen sliver of time, just fast forward 25 years and read my comment again. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ric Carter Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 11:37 To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Too Many for PAW 19 Not quite, actually. That one was shot last week;^) She is a lovely thing though. The 1982 ones are labeled WayBack. Maybe I should break these suckers into two albums. I was never quite sure how best to do that. Thanks for the peek. ric On May 16, 2007, at 9:12 PM, G Hopkinson wrote: > The first one from 1982, actually encapsulates one really > significant aspect of photography for me. > It's a nice casual portrait and not dated, I think. But that lady's > baby bump ought now be old enough to be out accomplishing who > knows what in the world. A genuine frozen sliver of time. That's > the way looking at older media always strikes me anyway. _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information