Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, Just buy a Nikon Coolscan V ED for 35mm - its very good value. An Epson 3170 ( or any other flatbed) is nowhere near as good for 35mm as a dedicated film scanner. Cheers Jayanand On 5/12/07, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I need some help and advices about what can I do with my scanning problem. > > First point: I'm scanning with a EPSON 3170, and I'm absolutely fully > satisfied and happy with the results, IMO I obtain better detail and tones > than scanning with Silverfast (too contrasty/hard), or Vuescan (Too > soft/smooth, loss of details, but better on the shadows). Please compare > these three pictures (For Vuescan and Silverfast I've used the trial > versions): > > This one was scanned with the Epson 3170 software, for me is perfect: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/01-Epson_w.jpg.html > > This one with Silverfast, contrast is more hard/strong, certain loss of > details > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/01-Siverfast3_w.jpg.html > > This one with Vuescan, more soft, more shadows details, please see an > important loss of details on the left corner > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/01-vuescan_w.jpg.html > > > Up to here, your question could be, what are you asking for?. > > HERE IS THE ORIGIN OF THE PROBLEM: when I scann with the Epson very dark > negatives the resulting image is: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/08-Epson_w.jpg.html > > usually with an important loss of parts of the image, for this reason I've > started the tests with Vuescan and Silverfast: > > With Silverfast > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/08-Silverfast2w.jpg.html > > With Vuescan > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Scann-Test/08-vuescan_w.jpg.html > > As you can appreciate Vuescan produce more detail on the shadows, but the > overall image quality I like is the one with the EPSON, and here is my > question: > > Could somebody tell me what can I do to avoid this problem with the Epson? > > Beside this, IMO is more friendly work with Silverfast tahn Vuescan, on > this > one every change you do it refresh and takes an enormous time!, on the > other > hand Silverfast has a wide range of films type to scann, you can better > define the resolution..., I like more the Silverfast software, but not the > final image. > > > Your comments and help will be really appreciated, > > Thanks in advance > Luis > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >