Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is a lovely kid, and she does chimp beautifully. Do you consider the frame shift (could have a bit less on top and a bit more on the bottom) due to the position of the RF vs the lens? I had this a few times when I did verticals. Thanks for showing, Philippe Op 7-mei-07, om 06:01 heeft Daniel Ridings het volgende geschreven: > Imaging > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2007/18.html > > The alternatives are from an old (dating from 1250) little church > about 20 kilometers south of where I live, Str?valla. > > The architectural style is "roman". That is, a square match-box. > The eastern wall in this style was originally just a flat wall. A > rounded "nisch" (absid) was added in the 1700's. > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2007v18/07v18-0006.jpg.html > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2007v18/07v18-0007.jpg.html > > There's more of Str?valla and the banquet > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2007v18/07v18-0004.jpg.html > > in the shoebox: > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/2007v18 > > The rectangles were taken with a Leica M4 and either a 50 or 90 > Tele-Elmarit (1/30 @ 2.8, Agfa APX400). The squares were taken with > a light Rolleicord IV. > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >