Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS: IMG: early April, NOW: Street Photography 'definition'
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Tue May 1 10:31:18 2007
References: <800066.89941.qm@web55901.mail.re3.yahoo.com><8312802B-50D2-4981-9B7B-979E9D786FAD@mac.com> <B9FB14BA-13F1-429C-A532-41A940F4F036@pandora.be>

Philippe,

I fully agree your criteria, that's more difficult is communicate to the
spectator the same sentiment you had when you took the image.

Saludos cordiales
Luis 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Philippe Orlent
Enviado el: martes, 01 de mayo de 2007 13:42
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: Re: [Leica] WAS: IMG: early April,NOW: Street Photography
'definition'

Street photography. 4 criteria for me.
What I consider the perfect street photograph is the following:
It is a photo made 'out there' (indoors or outdoors), in public places where
people that don't necesserally know each other meet, pass, interact or don't
interact.
It is a photo where you feel that the photographer was unnoticed.  
This doesn't mean that you can't have people looking into the lens, but it
should be with an 'empty' and non responsive look. Or that pre- recognition
look just before people understand that it's them that are being
photographed.
It is a photo that captures a moment that the viewer recognizes as being
unstaged, pure and genuine. A snap of life. A frozen moment.
And finally it is a photo that has a perfect composition. As if it was
staged to get all the elements in it at the right place at the right time.
Like everything suddenly falls into place. Without being staged.

Philippe



Op 30-apr-07, om 21:08 heeft Lottermoser George het volgende geschreven:

> We have a number of folks doing "street photography." I have a number 
> of conflicting feelings about this sort of work. I find your work to 
> be quite interesting. I'd love for this group to discuss the genre. 
> Just about the time I start feeling, "this stuff is really boring. Why 
> do people photograph other people standing or walking on the street?" 
> I open your images and feel, "oh these are some interesting images of 
> people standing or walking on the street." Can one articulate what 
> makes a powerful "street photograph?"
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:04 AM, H. Ball Arche wrote:
>
>>   http://tinyurl.com/2m8kyn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] WAS: IMG: early April, NOW: Street Photography 'definition')
In reply to: Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] IMG: early April)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IMG: early April)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] WAS: IMG: early April, NOW: Street Photography 'definition')