Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Fri Apr 20 13:28:27 2007
References: <FA64FC1A5B56F4A3FEFB8D2F@hindolveston.reid.org> <003f01c782f6$e65f4f00$5a406543@MacPhisto> <01b201c7830a$9cd588e0$d6809aa0$@net> <9b678e0704201042h28689027v96710c67863247c5@mail.gmail.com> <022f01c78384$c6cddb50$546991f0$@net>
> Certainly I would have raised a stink.....
I chose not to raise a stink because I wanted to get my lens back so I could
use it, and I figured that if I raised a stink it would delay everything.
And the amount of money they were asking was not quite enough to make me
want to phone Tony Soprano.
Replies:
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again)
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:Leica USA incompetence again)