Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]G Hopkinson wrote: > Jack, yes better on both counts for my taste, however your own view is the > one that counts. > Were you happy with a print from this? > > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Jack Maddox > Sent: Thursday, 19 April 2007 00:47 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] spring photoshop adjusted > > Hi All, > > I adjusted the color balance and sharpened my listing of a sign of > spring. I think it is a better. What do you think. > > photoshop adjusted: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/smilingjack/Jack+Maddox/spring+photoshoped.jpg.html > http://tinyurl.com/2bbsqu > > original: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/smilingjack/Jack+Maddox/a+sign+of+spring.jpg.html > http://tinyurl.com/2mnoqb > > Jack > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Hoppy, I haven't made a print but on my monitor it suits me better. It is not literal but as I had visualized a print. It is so easy to over due adjustments in photoshop that I tend to do less than more. I just didn't like the original after it was posted and so decided to change it. It is always nice to have the opinions of others. thanks for helping Jack