Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] K-word - Apologies inside
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed Apr 11 11:31:57 2007
References: <181542.2972.qm@web82305.mail.mud.yahoo.com><43E82D38-6A5B-446E-89E3-AB2CDB07B24C@cox.net> <461CE00E.2060003@numericable.fr> <000701c77c3d$939037e0$6501a8c0@asus930> <461CF3DE.1040505@numericable.fr>

On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Philippe Amard wrote:

> Hoppy, thanks for your support.
> I agree with you on Steve's photos - the little girl was cute even  
> though the fashion (very soft colors I wrote if I remember well) of  
> the younger is not what I like best. It is simply a matter of  
> taste. As to the word, I'll turn the episode into a joke before long.


je l'espere bien...Steve


>
> Thanks again.
> Phil...x
>
>
> G Hopkinson wrote:
>
>> Phil. I don't think that you are likely to be struck off for using  
>> a K word! Actually I haven't seen your post nor the response here
>> thus far.
>> On Steve's photo, I'm very interested to see any followup from  
>> Steve or others. I had commented that I was distracted a little from
>> the girl's eyes by the sharp detail of the elaborate hairdressing.  
>> Always so much to learn here. I think that Steve's model was
>> dressed for some kind of harvest festival event. Just gorgeous  
>> costume, to me. The other shot "ribbons" I thought was graphically
>> stronger with hthe lady's hair and the ribbons patterns.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hoppy
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org  
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On  
>> Behalf Of
>> Philippe Amard
>> Sent: Wednesday, 11 April 2007 23:18
>> To: leicareflex@freelists.org
>> Cc: LUG Group
>> Subject: [Leica] K-word - Apologies inside
>>
>> Hi listers and luggers,
>>
>> Charlie pointed out to me the right definition of Kitsch <http:// 
>> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitsch>
>>
>> I knew the origins as an art school debate motive and I used the K  
>> word for a pix by Steve Barbour, in earnest ... not about the
>> photo - which was excellent - but about the young girl's hairdo -  
>> my (kitschy?) taste, I know. So sorry Steve if there was any kind
>> of misunderstanding about this.
>>
>> I am fully ready to make penance if I have offended any lugger/ 
>> lister by innocently using the - forbidden? - K word, and to repeat a
>> kilotimes in a row : Keep Cheeky Chicken in each Kitschy Kitchen  
>> as a punishment. Will serve me a lesson.
>>
>> Thanks again
>> Phil...x
>>
>> PS  I sincerely hope I have not offended anyone, really ;-) .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: [LRflex] Re: smell the flowers)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] K-word - Apologies inside)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] K-word - Apologies inside)
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] K-word - Apologies inside)