Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:25 AM -0400 4/11/07, Stan Yoder wrote: >I did the math on the diagonal of the 18x27mm sensor of the M8. >Turns out to be 32mm near enough, which is what the 24 becomes on an >M8. So the 24 is the theoretical "normal" for the M8. However, the >50mm 'normal' lens on 35mm film cameras would be better matched by a >28mm on the M8 (=37mm.) Stan, I think you're doing a double conversion there. The theoretical 'normal' lens, ie, the diagonal, is the actual diagonal. In this case it's 32mm. Therefore if anyone made a 32mm lens, that would be a 'normal' lens on the M8. The 24 is a wide on the M8. The field of view of the 50 on 35mm film is matched by a 37.5mm lens on the M8. A 28mm lens gives the equivalent of a 37mm lens on 35mm film. >Actually, the 28 framelines of the M8 VF include slightly more than >the 50 lines of my M2's VF. > >And, since a 35mm lens is/was the functional 'normal' with film for >many of us, a 21mm lens would be the near-equivalent on an M8. Again, you're doing a double conversion. The closest common focal length equivalent to the angle of view of a 35mm lens on 35mm film is the 28mm lens on the M8. > >Or am I all wet? > >Stan Yoder >Pittsburgh > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com