Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Interesting "Official" Response from Leica
From: clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss)
Date: Sun Apr 1 06:02:12 2007
References: <460EEAB0.9010009@gmail.com> <CFE6E864-FEE4-45BF-8977-F10EB534070E@btinternet.com>

No, you are right. I read their response to mean that the RAW data 
itself would be modified, not only the metadata. If only the metadata 
were modified, that could be corrected at processing time, and the Leica 
response would make no sense.

Clive
http://www.clive.moss.net/blog/




on 4/1/2007 5:32 AM Frank Dernie said the following:
> I expect the lens specific data has to be in the DNG file otherwise a 
> correct raw conversion would be impossible surely?
> Aren't ALL raw file formats raw data plus camera/lens specific data so 
> the raw convertor knows what to do. If not Adobe would not need to 
> continually issue updates of their raw converter adding new cameras.
> Am I mistaken?
> Frank
> 
> 
> On 1 Apr, 2007, at 00:11, Clive Moss wrote:
> 
>> So, the coding will change the DNG files, not just the JPG. Unexpected.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

In reply to: Message from clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss) ([Leica] Interesting "Official" Response from Leica)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Interesting "Official" Response from Leica)