Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CV lens recommendations
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Fri Mar 30 12:52:01 2007
References: <698362.29101.qm@web34207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <p0623090ac2332117d7cc@[10.1.16.139]>

The writeup Henning is referring to is in the Viewfinder Volume 34  
no. 3. That VF is a 2001 pub. You might find it in the 2001 LUG  
archives.

Len


On Mar 30, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 1:07 PM -0700 3/30/07, Photo Phreak wrote:
>> Has anyone compared the lens formula for these two with the two  
>> old SuperAngulons ?
>>     I get the impression that some of these "new" rangefinder  
>> lenses are the older formula lenses with computer recomputation,  
>> more modern glass and multi-coating.  I am sure modern production  
>> technology may help as well.
>>     As good as the newer Leica 21s have been they do not alway  
>> seem to produce an image with the same "character" as the  
>> SuperAngulons do. The SuperAngulons were true short focus lenses  
>> where the newer 21s are retrofocus or reverse-telephoto.  Both  
>> have distinctive "signatures".
>>
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> Thank you very much for the information on the CV glass. I  
>> particularly
>> find useful the fact that the 21/4 is superior to the 21/2.8
>> non-aspheric. If I were to have bought one I more than likely  
>> would have
>> chosen the faster lens. More than one person has told me they do not
>> like the Nokton for various reasons. I won't be buying it. Some also
>> say that the glass flares and other that it doesn't. I tend to  
>> believe
>> that if it happens to one it could happen to all. From what I am  
>> hearing
>> the CV lens is not as good as Leica but still a good value for the
>> money. I have had recommendations for the 50/2.0 Heliar and the  
>> APO 90.
>> Over the weekend I will decide which of these two I would like to  
>> have.
>>
>> Jack
>
> I did a comparison of 4 different 21's a couple of years ago for  
> the Viewfinder, which included the 21/3.4 SA, the 21/4CV, the  
> 21/3.5 Ricoh and the 21/2.8 ASPH. Over the years I've had and used  
> about 15 different 20's and 21's.
>
> The writeup was also posted to the LUG, so it should be here  
> somewhere.
>
> -- 
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from leicam4pro at yahoo.com (Photo Phreak) ([Leica] CV lens recommendations)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] CV lens recommendations)