Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: PAW(*) 2007 #10
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Mon Mar 5 12:54:51 2007
References: <5f1be6b50703051244u16c07813g6c8ee2d7aa2e8b8f@mail.gmail.com>

Op 5-mrt-07, om 21:44 heeft David Keenan het volgende geschreven:

>> Nice and relaxed pose, but why did you keep the frame 'unstraight'?
>
> Philippe --
>
> I considered "straightening" things at the time I made the original  
> image.
> But I decided that I didn't want it to be "perfect". I often make  
> just the
> kind of image corrections that you suggested and, sometimes, I  
> think that it
> results in, for the lack of a better word, a sterile image. Maybe  
> the word
> "static" could be substituted for "sterile".
>
> So, I decided to not correct the tilt of the frame (it is crooked  
> on the
> wall) and to crop part off part of Jean's arm -- to leave the image
> imperfect and to, perhaps, inject some tension or energy into it.
>
> Do you think it works?

Not really. I think it might have if you would have taken it from a  
lower angle, though.


>
> Dave.
> -- 
> Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
> 2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw
> 2006 EuroBlog: www.david-keenan.com/euroblog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Re: PAW(*) 2007 #10)