Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Mon Feb 12 12:35:21 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be> <7EE687B3-DF2D-4C30-9EB2-81451BB2E7D7@mac.com>

Can you tell me where they sell that one M lens?
;-)
Thanks for the info, George.
Philippe



Op 12-feb-07, om 18:01 heeft Lottermoser George het volgende geschreven:

> 24-70 L USM: Wonderful, Sharp, Fast.
> 70-200 L IS USM: Wonderful, Sharp, Fast.
> 10-22 EF-S USM: Wonderful, Extremely Sharp (won't work on 5D
> These are my only Canon lenses. All the primes I use with Canon are  
> Glass.
> The 16-35 L USM version I had was a loser. Not sharp (may have been  
> a single instance issue - I've heard others speak well of it)
>
> Only one M lens: would be the 35 lux asph and 28 cron asph ;~)
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
>
>> What are your impressions of the following lenses?
>> Canon EF 24-70mm L f2.8 USM
>>
>> Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
>>
>> Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L USM
>>
>> And, if you'd only keep one lens on your analog M, which one would  
>> that be?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)