Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]True, but I was thinking of communication through influenting. A dangerous weapon in the hands of those that want to market stuff and get it sold. Web 2.0 is already infested with payed people to influence 'the truth' of a blog or so. Philippe Op 7-feb-07, om 21:20 heeft Didier Ludwig het volgende geschreven: > The target group are 20-25 yrs old sudents of Design Management. > Web 2.0 is not only gizmo. Consider the LUG as one of the first Web > 2.0 archetype communities... it does less matter if the > communication happens by mail and lug-gallery, or by instant > messangers and flickr, smugmug, youtube or similar. But I shure > believe the social cohesion is much bigger in the LUG than in > mentioned sites > Didier > > >> When the target group has some intelligence, a list is a far better >> way of communicating then any Web 2.0 gizmo. >> Philippe >> >> >> Op 7-feb-07, om 20:08 heeft Didier Ludwig het volgende geschreven: >>> I'm actually preparing student lectures about web communities and >>> Web 2.0. The LUG and the actual group behaviour in favour of a >>> member will be mentioned prominently. >>> Didier >>> >>> >>>> I hope everyone knows that over at the LRFLEX and LEG lists >>>> everyone is helping out too. >>>> Doesn't it make you feel really warm inside! >>>> WHAT A COMMUNITY SPIRIT!! >>>> Douglas > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >