Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
From: phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard)
Date: Wed Jan 31 12:09:13 2007
References: <45C0C56C.6040702@numericable.fr> <F59BCCD0-D7A0-40AF-BDBE-47A46530F581@mindspring.com> <97AAAC5D-5764-4695-8286-9BF45B2C3904@mindspring.com> <3cad2b2b24e3451473c6e646c600b16e@comcast.net>

Hi Bob,

I guess you're talking to Ric (and I totally agree with you) - mine are 
not that good, so one of the aims of this post is to get opinions on 
mine so that I can improve.

Cheers
Phileicangemix.


Bob Shaw wrote:

> I like them all (subject to horizons, crop, etc.) for one reason; 
> there is a wonderful "look" to them, as from a 1920's textbook.
>
> These would print well on something like Epson Enhanced Matte, with a 
> wide white border or matting.  Funny, but I can see them as large 
> gallery sized prints.
>
> Nice work.
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:05, Ric Carter wrote:
>
> Phil--
>
> I should mention that my sensitivity to unverticals is not so much 
> professional, as a disability;^)
>
> Ric Carter
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Ric Carter wrote:
>
>> I like the framing of 3 best, but it really needs squaring up. The 
>> tilted verticals bug me.
>>
>> I guess that's part of the good thing about 4, but I hate to lose the 
>> hand on the poster.
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Philippe Amard wrote:
>>
>>> May have your opinion on the three PSed versions of a single shot 
>>> taken a couple of days ago?
>>>
>>> For my statistics, could you let me know your preference order (fast 
>>> and easy) :
>>>
>>> WoS1 =
>>> WoS2 =
>>> WoS3 =
>>>
>>> Perhaps, time permitting, you could also let me know why - a bit 
>>> more demanding but it would certainly help me more :-[ .
>>>
>>> Any comments and advice most welcome - good or bad for the former.
>>> Thanks in anticipation.
>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/>
>>> Yours
>>> Phileicangemix
>>>
>>> PS: N? 4 is simply a BW n?3 - Oh yes, the link ! 
>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/?g2_page=1>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)