Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
From: phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard)
Date: Wed Jan 31 09:01:54 2007
References: <45C0C56C.6040702@numericable.fr> <E0AA80D7-2E60-4628-A7B3-3F4A4006E3EC@mac.com>
 
Thanks George - I'll try that too and post it for a better comparison.

Phx

Lottermoser George wrote:

> I don't see the one that may work the best. I'd try a 4th version  
> which is cropped tight on left, top and right (as 3) however  
> including as much of the foreground walkway as you have on the frame.  
> I believe that this would give you a solid and compelling  
> composition. I'd also dodge a bit on the figure.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Philippe Amard wrote:
>
>> WoS1 =
>> WoS2 =
>> WoS3 =
>>
>> Perhaps, time permitting, you could also let me know why - a bit  
>> more demanding but it would certainly help me more :-[ .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited)